correspondence · the letterWe write when there is something worth sending.
Four kinds of writing — regulatory analysis, field notes, engineering, and positions — sent when there is something to say. Not a drip campaign. Not a growth tactic. Not sold to anyone.
What the letter is
Regulatory analysis
A rule, statute, or executive action, read closely before it reaches your desk — written the way we would brief a client, not the way a trade press rewrites a press release.
Field notes
What a real deployment looks like once a firm is running on it: what broke, what held, what we would build differently. Anonymized where a firm asks for it, never written as a case study built to sell.
Engineering
How the system is actually built — the reading pipeline, how Taju compiles, the constraints we design around and the ones we have not solved yet.
Positions
Where we disagree with the conventional wisdom about AI in regulated industries, stated plainly, with our name on it.
When there is something worth sending — not a schedule.
There is no weekly or monthly cadence invented to keep an open rate up. We write when a rule changes, a deployment teaches us something worth passing on, or we have a position worth putting our name on. Some months that is nothing. That is by design, not an accident of a content calendar we failed to fill.
Just as binding: what it will not do.
- 01
It will not run a lead-generation drip. No onboarding sequence, no nurture track, no cadence engineered to move you toward a sale.
- 02
It will not publish filler. If there is nothing worth saying, nothing goes out that week, that month, or that quarter.
- 03
It will not sell, rent, or share this list. Ever.
Give us an address. We will use it rarely.
further reading: the regulatory reference shelf and field notes and positions as they publish. what we collect when you subscribe is described on Privacy.